The rapid advancement of AI saw law firms fundamentally rethinking their traditional business models, and embracing innovation to remain competitive and meet the evolving client expectations. As stated by Thomson Reuters, the legal sector is moving beyond its historical perception of a “profession” to operating as a “sophisticated business” – meaning technology is no longer a choice but a strategy for survival and sustained growth in 2025.

The problem is, the legal sector has not historically been recognised for its agility or innovation. Firms that proactively integrate AI are set to gain a substantial first-mover advantage, while those that delay, risk falling behind in market share, client satisfaction, and overall profitability.

While AI presents unprecedented opportunities for enhancing efficiency, automating routine tasks, and creating new avenues for value delivery, it also introduces significant risks. These include critical concerns related to data security, ethical considerations surrounding AI’s application, and the imperative for accuracy in AI-generated outputs.

This article will explore the key trends shaping the legal landscape in 2025 and beyond, detail the critical risks emerging from this technological shift, and demonstrate how GAI Translate offers a strategic solution to navigate these challenges responsibly and effectively.

Key trends shaping 2025 and beyond

The evolution that the legal sector undergoes is multifaceted, characterised by shifts in technology adoption, operational paradigms, and client engagement. Here we explain what they are individually.

A. The ascent of AI in legal practice

It is clear that generative AI is rapidly gaining traction within the legal profession. Roughly 31% of legal professionals are personally using generative AI for work-related purposes, marking an increase from 27% in the previous year. Despite this growing individual initiative, firm-wide adoption remains more cautious, remaining at 21%.

This disparity between individual comfort with AI and firm implementation points to an emerging “shadow AI” phenomenon within legal practices. Firms risk not fully realising AI’s potential by being too slow to integrate it, while simultaneously facing unmanaged risks from employees using unvetted personal AI tools for sensitive work. This situation necessitates robust internal policies, approved tools, and comprehensive training to bridge the gap and ensure secure, ethical AI integration.

Within functions, many are using AI tools to enhance operational efficiencies across many aspects of legal practice. For instance, 54% of legal professionals are utilising AI to draft correspondence, while 14% employ it for analysing firm data. AI also plays an increasing role in scheduling and streamlining billing processes. Notably, 47% of legal professionals have expressed interest in AI tools that can provide insights from a firm’s financial data, reflecting there’s a growing demand for AI in business decision-making.

As AI innovation progresses rapidly, areas like automating routine tasks such as document review, legal research, and contract analysis could free up an estimated four hours of a legal professional’s time per week, translating into substantial productivity gains and potentially significant new billable time annually.

B. Digital transformation and cloud integration

Another emerging trend of the legal industry is the adoption of digital transformation and cloud solutions. According to the American Bar Association, about 73% of firms now utilise cloud-based legal tools, such as document management and practice management softwares. While these widespread adoption of cloud solutions offer numerous benefits, it also expands the potential attack surface for cyber threats. This suggests that robust cybersecurity measures are becoming a foundational requirement for digital transformation.

Evidently, this digital shift extends deeply into litigation practices, where 85% of litigators are now using electronic court filings. Furthermore, AI discovery tools are gaining considerable traction, contributing to improved efficiency in the litigation process.

C. Client-centricity and evolving expectations

The sector has also seen a shift in client expectations, which demand greater communication, transparency, and real-time updates throughout the entire case lifecycle. Legal professionals are increasingly looking to AI to enhance the value delivered to clients. This includes leveraging AI to handle large volumes of legal data more effectively, cited by 59% of respondents as a key benefit. Additionally, AI is seen as instrumental in improving client response times (estimated 41%) and providing advanced analytics for informed decision-making (estimated 33%).

There is also a discernible shift in legal services’ pricing models, such as subscription-based and value-based pricing. This allows for more straightforward financial planning for clients and enables law firms to scale their services more effectively.

The demand for enhanced client experience, particularly transparency and faster responses, combined with the increasing prevalence of cross-border legal services, creates a critical need for seamless and accurate multilingual communication. Mistranslations or communication delays can directly impact client satisfaction, hinder deal closures, and even lead to severe legal liabilities. This elevates precise translation from a mere administrative task to a strategic enabler of client trust and global competitiveness.

D. The business of law: adapting models for the future

The legal industry is increasingly operating like a sophisticated business, driven by changing client expectations, competitive market dynamics, and significant advancements in AI-driven technology. Despite a surprisingly strong financial performance in 2024, law firms are strongly urged to invest in “retooling” their business models and embracing new technologies, to maintain competitiveness and meet the evolving client needs.

The observation that law firms need to become more agile and innovative directly challenges their traditional, often conservative, operational structures. This implies that successful firms will be those that not only adopt technology but also undergo significant organisational change, including upskilling their workforce and fostering a culture of continuous adaptation to leverage AI effectively.

Navigating the new frontier: emerging risks and challenges

The rapid technological advancements in the legal sector, while promising, also introduce a complex array of risks and challenges that demand proactive management.

A. Data privacy and cybersecurity imperatives

The explosive growth of AI systems, which thrive on massive datasets often containing personal and sensitive information, raises significant concerns about potential data misuse, ethical boundaries, and the extent and purpose of data collection. Additionally, cyber-attacks and data breaches remain persistent, with phishing and ransomware continuing to be prevalent risks for law firms. This environment places increasing pressure on businesses to prioritise ethical data practices and demonstrate robust accountability in their data handling processes.

The global regulatory landscape is undergoing a significant overhaul, with transformative legislation concerning privacy, AI, and cybersecurity commencing a major revision of compliance requirements. Fragmented global landscape necessitates cross-border compliance strategies, including localising data storage where required and adopting region-specific privacy frameworks to ensure operational and legal consistency across diverse jurisdictions.

The confluence of increased AI data reliance and fragmented global privacy regulations creates a complex compliance minefield for legal firms. In this environment, a single data breach or regulatory misstep can lead to severe financial penalties, extensive litigation, and irreparable damage to a firm’s reputation and client trust. This demands a “privacy-by-design” approach to all technology integration, ensuring that privacy considerations are embedded from the outset, rather than being an afterthought. Firms must move beyond mere compliance to proactively build trust and demonstrate accountability.

B. Ethical AI and regulatory fragmentation

Many AI models, particularly deep learning systems, are often described as “black boxes,” which cannot explain how they arrive at specific decisions. This opacity raises considerable concerns about accountability and the potential for AI algorithms to unintentionally perpetuate biases present in their training data, thereby amplifying privacy and fairness concerns.

Within the legal profession, there is a strong consensus regarding the boundaries of AI application. A significant 96% of legal professionals believe that allowing AI to represent clients in court would be “a step too far,” and 83% consider using AI to provide legal advice to be an inappropriate use case.

This indicates a clear demand for human oversight and the establishment of robust in-house rules to regulate AI use within legal practices. The “black box” problem and the risk of AI perpetuating biases directly conflict with the legal profession’s core principles of fairness, due process, and explainable reasoning. This means that legal AI solutions must prioritise transparency, auditability, and human-in-the-loop mechanisms to maintain ethical standards and avoid legal challenges stemming from biased or unexplainable AI outputs.

C. Accuracy and quality assurance in AI output

There are emerging concerns around the quality and usefulness of AI output. Legal documents, by their very nature, require absolute precision and enforceability. This critical requirement means that any AI tools utilised in legal practice must draw from sources developed and maintained by reputable legal experts, and crucially, be transparent about their data sources. Firms require specialised AI trained on high-quality, domain-specific legal data to ensure accuracy and reliability, especially given the complex implications of errors in legal matters.

Table 1: key legal sector trends & associated risks

A checklist for law firms: how to insure against AI risks

We’ve created a detailed checklist and guide for you to address AI risks. Download the checklist to receive your comprehensive guide and our recommended solutions.